Monday, April 28, 2008

Yale Senior "Art" Projected Aborted

From the Yale Daily News:

Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.

But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.”
“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.”

Well, what a sweet child. Imagine how lovely her parents are, and how proud of her they must be.

And what did Yale have to say about this?

Statement by Yale spokesperson Helaine S. Klasky:
Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials. She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body.
She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art.
Had these acts been real, they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns
.

...and then these two other statements from Yale faculty were published:

http://www.yale.edu/opa/newsr/08-04-18-05.all.html

Aliza Shvarts needs to have her head examined, perhaps with forceps.

I am glad that I am not paying $33,800 for my kid to attend such a dysfunctional place of "higher learning." From the same people who care about the treatment of animals...

And just when I thought it was over, Shvarts in an interview later Thursday afternoon, defended her work and called the University’s statement “ultimately inaccurate.” She reiterated that she engaged in the nine-month process she publicized on Wednesday in a press release that was first reported in the News: repeatedly using a needleless syringe to insert semen into herself, then taking abortifacient herbs at the end of her menstrual cycle to induce bleeding. Thursday evening, in a tour of her art studio, she shared with the News video footage she claimed depicted her attempts at self-induced miscarriages.
“No one can say with 100-percent certainty that anything in the piece did or did not happen,” Shvarts said, adding that she does not know whether she was ever pregnant. “The nature of the piece is that it did not consist of certainties
.”

I believe someone described her as a malignant narcissist. I'll second that.

4 comments:

DirtCrashr said...

Malignant Narcissist is putting it nicely, what a nasty little creature.

fetching jen said...

This is probably the single most shockingly disturbing story I have read in a very long time. How despicable to have raised such a monster.

DirtCrashr said...

The profoundly grotesque level to which she attained seems to have escaped her, and the attempt to flatten it as normative is even more disturbing.

Bloviating Zeppelin said...

And we wonder why Islam hates us.

BZ